Starbucks and skinny culture
If you haven’t heard it in queue at your local Starbucks yet, skinny is the word. Responding to increased customer demand for nonfat, sugar-free, no-whip versions of their drinks, this new label is set to become the hippest lingo in Barista-speak.
How do I feel about the skinny move? When I first heard, I was very torn over this big change Starbucks has implemented for “our health”. I think it’s fantastic to get more folks drinking skim milk, versus whole or 2 percent. At the same time, my reservations outweigh this small benefit. First, the consumer Starbucks is targeting already believes she makes ‘health-conscious’ decisions when she orders her mouthful-of-a-drink, they’re just streamlining the process. Second, what happens when a girl like me, who would otherwise order a ‘tall nonfat 2-pump caramel latte’ for a treat succumbs to the easier-on-the-tongue ‘skinny caramel latte’ and in doing so inadverdently becomes an artificial sweetener consumer?
The press release states: “Just in time for the New Year, Starbucks helps customers keep their resolutions without sacrificing flavor with the introduction of the ‘Skinny’ platform, a nonfat Latte made with sugar-free syrup … The Skinny Latte will be featured on menu boards starting in January 2008 and available at participating Starbucks as a core beverage offering in North America, so customers can enjoy this lower calorie, sweet tasting espresso beverage all year long.” (emphasis added)
This leads to my third reservation about the Skinny platform: it perpetrates a ‘more is better’ approach to eating and drinking. I would guess that the same consumer who chooses the skinny option may also upgrade her order from a Tall to Grande, or Grande to Venti beverage. The rationale: since her beverage is lower-calorie, she can consume more for the same ‘nutritional price’. To me, the smaller size (and really, at 12oz, is a Tall really all that small?) provides plenty of hot deliciousness, healthy protein and calcium, and keeps the pocketbook from becoming too skinny.
Fourth, let’s unpack the subconscious tale behind this new Skinny moniker. Starbucks is sending a message to an already-weight-obsessed demographic – your drink is skinny, and you should be, too! You might counter that I am blowing a drink name out of proportion, but it’s not a healthy latte, or a nourishing latte, or a better choice latte. Skinny is a claim that a company doesn’t have to explain, or qualify. While healthy conjures a particular meaning in one’s mind, skinny is ambiguously appealing.
Fifth, and finally, by marketing these drinks as a food for the health-conscious, an occasional treat becomes a daily necessity. From where I stand, no one should be making a sweet, dessert-like breakfast a staple item on the walk to school or commute to the office – whether it’s made with aspartame or sugar and a mountain of whipping cream. These beverages are best enjoyed sitting in the cafe, coat off, from a real mug, conversing with friends or people-watching or reading a book. When a sweet treat is rare indulgence, I am inclined to do the anti-skinny; top off my dessert with a blob of delicious full-fat real whipping cream – and lick my spoon, to boot!




I was instantly turned off to the “skinny” too. It just feels wrong to me. Glad I’m not the only one.
I saw that! I wonder how it’ll go over. I sold a horse to a starbucks barista, I’m going to have to ask how her customers are taking this. LOL
Very interesting blog – I will be back to check you out some more. I try to buy most of my groceries on the perimeter too!
I can’t believe you’ve snuck back into blogging without an announcement!
They totally perpetuate the more is better thing with the “skinny” marketing scheme, which was even sort of mentioned at my dad’s WW meeting this weekend. If everyone bought a tall instead of a grande every day for a year, they’d save themselves about 10lbs a year.
I say let’s focus on portion distortion first and then tackle the rest.
Welcome back, Maria!!
Amen.
My husband and I stop by Starbucks once a week or so for a “treat” after dinner. On that day, I save my calories so I can have the full monty, as it were. I’d rather have tall white chocolate mocha with the whipped cream than submit my body to lab created foods. To me, more of the fake bits = no treat at all. That said, I wish I could say that I was living a completely whole foods/organic life. I’m not, but I’m slowly mending my ways. I appreciate your blog as a resource for those of us who are trying to change the way we live.
Cheers!
j